Influence of Classroom Ergonomics on Students' Academic Productivity and Emotional Disposition

Authors

  • Mercedes Ibanez Research Teacher, AUPA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31154/isc12.v12i3.98.628-638

Keywords:

classroom ergonomics, academic productivity, emotional disposition

Abstract

The ergonomic design of learning plays a vital role in ensuring students' comfort, safety, and educational engagement. Inadequate ergonomic conditions may result in physical discomfort and inefficient learning motivation. Environmental factors such as lighting and air quality can also influence emotional health. Given students’ ongoing interaction with their physical learning environment, this research explored how classroom ergonomics relate to academic productivity and emotional wellbeing. Using a descriptive-correlational method, the study gathered data from 179 junior and senior high school students. The results revealed that students generally rated classroom ergonomics, academic performance, and emotional well-being, including valence and activation, at high levels. Strong positive correlations were found among these variables. Notably, the comfort of classroom furniture emerged as a significant predictor, explaining 39.5% of academic productivity variance. It also predicted 26.2% of activation, while lighting conditions accounted for 30.8% of valence. The study emphasizes the importance of well-designed classrooms in promoting better academic outcomes and emotional wellbeing. Future research is encouraged to explore these dynamics using broader participant samples and considering variations across school types, age, and gender.

References

Ablyaeva, A. V., Minacheva, A. I., & Fatkhutdinova, L. M. (2023). Influence of ergonomics of schoolchildren’s workplaces on the occurrence of musculoskeletal discomfort. Hygiene and Sanitation, 101(12), 1548–1554. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2022-101-12-1548-1554

Ahmad, C. N. C., Yahaya, A., Abdullah, M. F. N. L., & Adnan, M. (2015). An Instrument to assess physical aspects of Classroom Environment in Malaysia. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295072684_an_instrument_to_assess_physical_aspects_of_classroom_environment_in_malaysia

Alibegović, A., Hadžiomerović, A. M., Pašalić, A., & Domljan, D. (2020). School furniture ergonomics in prevention of pupils' poor sitting posture. Drvna Industrija, 71(1), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.5552/drvind.2020.1920

Barrett, P., Davies, F., Zhang, Y., & Barrett, L. (2015). The impact of classroom design on pupils’ learning: Final results of a holistic, multi-level analysis. Building and Environment, 89, 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.013

Bashir, Z. S., Misquith, C., Has, P., et al. (2024). The Effectiveness of Virtual Reality on Anxiety and Pain Management in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus, 16(4), e57557.

Byers, T., Imms, W., & Hartnell-Young, E. (2018). Comparative analysis of the impact of traditional versus innovative learning environment on student attitudes and learning outcomes. Studies in Educational Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.STUEDUC.2018.07.003.

Brink, H. W., Lechner, S. C., Loomans, M. G., Mobach, M. P., & Kort, H. S. (2023). Understanding how indoor environmental classroom conditions influence academic performance in higher education. Facilities, 42(3/4), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1108/f-12-2022-0164

Dockrell, J. E., & Shield, B. M. (2003). Children’s perceptions of their acoustic environment at school and at home. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115(6), 2964–2973. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1570439

González-Zamar, M., Jiménez, L. O., Ayala, A. S., & Abad-Segura, E. (2020). The Impact of the university classroom on Managing Socio-Educational Well-being: a Global study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3), 931. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030931

Gumasing, M. J. J., Dela Cruz, I. S. V., Piñon, D. A. A., Rebong, H. N. M., & Sahagun, D. L. P. (2023). Ergonomic factors affecting the learning motivation and academic attention of SHS students in distance learning. Sustainability, 15(12), 9202. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129202()

Incekara, C. (2022). Designing Ergonomic Post-Covid-19 School Furniture. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering. https://doi.org/10.7166/33-2-2515

Jabeen, R., & Hussain, N. (2022). Teachers' awareness and practices on school ergonomics in Karachi, Pakistan. Journal of Humanities Social and Management Sciences (JHSMS), 3(1), 366–381. https://doi.org/10.47264/idea.jhsms/3.1.26

Karadağ, N. (2018). Views of Instructors about Academic Productivity. International Journal of Progressive Education, 14(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2018.154.1

Khalid, W., Anwar, N., Sajid, M., & Butt, S. I. (2020). A methodology for assessment of thermal comfort, ergonomic and human factors effect on learning performance in classroom environment. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (pp. 439–444). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51041-1_58

Khan, H., Gul, R., & Zeb, M. (2023). The Effect of Students’ Cognitive and Emotional Engagement on Students’ Academic Success and Academic Productivity. Journal of Social Sciences Review, 3(1), 323–332.

Kret, M., & Gelder, B. (2012). A review on sex differences in processing emotional signals. Neuropsychologia, 50, 1211-1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.12.022.

Küller, R., Ballal, S., Laike, T., Mikellides, B., & Tonello, G. (2006). The impact of light and colour on psychological mood: a cross-cultural study of indoor work environments. Ergonomics, 49(14), 1496–1507. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130600858142

Lacoe, J. (2020). Too Scared to Learn? The Academic Consequences of Feeling Unsafe in the Classroom. Urban Education, 55, 1385 - 1418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085916674059

Latip, M. S. A., Latip, S. N. N. A., Tamrin, M., & Rahim, F. A. (2024). Modelling physical ergonomics and student performance in higher education: the mediating effect of student motivation. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-01-2024-0052

Loredan, N., Kastelic, K., Burnard, M., & Šarabon, N. (2022). Ergonomic evaluation of school furniture in Slovenia: From primary school to university. Work (Reading, Mass.), 73, 229–245. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-210487

Mazina, Y., Koposova, E., Matveev, V., & Matveeva, N. (2021). Methods of ensuring comfort and quality in the design of ecological and safe school furniture. Bulletin of the Innovative University of Eurasia, 84(4), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.37788/2021-4/76-82

Mogas-Recalde, J., & Palau, R. (2020). Classroom lighting and its effect on student learning and performance: Towards smarter conditions. In Smart innovation, systems and technologies (pp. 3–12). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7383-5_1

Polytechnic University of the Philippines. (2024). Academic Productivity Scale Questionare: MSU - Psychology Major Students. Studoco. https://www.studocu.com/ph/document/polytechnic-university-of-the-philippines/bs-psychology/aps-test-questionnaire/56185714

Posner, J., Russell, J. A., & Peterson, B. S. (2005). The circumplex model of affect: An integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 17(03). https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579405050340

Rands, M. L., & Gansemer-Topf, A. M. (2017). The room itself is active: How classroom design impacts student engagement. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6(1), 26–33.

Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161-1178. https://pdodds.w3.uvm.edu/research/papers/others/1980/russell1980a.pdf

Scherer, K. R. (2021). Evidence for the existence of emotion dispositions and the effects of appraisal bias. Emotion, 21(6), 1224–1238. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000861

Shi, Y., Tong, M., & Long, T. (2021). Investigating relationships among blended synchronous learning environments, students' motivation, and cognitive engagement: A mixed methods study. Computers & Education, 168, 104193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104193

Shield, B. M., & Dockrell, J. E. (2003). The Effects of Noise on Children at School: A review. Building Acoustics, 10(2), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1260/135101003768965960

Soltaninejad, M., Babaei-Pouya, A., Poursadeqiyan, M., & Arefi, M. F. (2021). Ergonomics factors influencing school education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A literature review. Work, 68(1), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-203355

Toyinbo, O. (2023). Indoor Environmental Quality, Pupils' Health, and Academic Performance—A Literature review. Buildings, 13(9), 2172. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13092172

Utku, D., Güner, G., Altuğ, G., & Güney, A. (2021). An ergonomic classroom design application at a university in turkey. Verimlilik Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.51551/verimlilik.825104

Visentin, C., Prodi, N., Pellegatti, M., Garraffa, M., & Di Domenico, A. (2023). Listening effort for sentence comprehension in noisy classrooms: the mediating role of linguistic factors, inhibitory control and noise sensitivity. NOISE-CON Proceedings, 265(5), 2399–2407. https://doi.org/10.3397/in_2022_0341

Wang, M., Degol, J. L., Amemiya, J., Parr, A., & Guo, J. (2020). Classroom climate and children’s academic and psychological well being: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Developmental Review, 57, 100912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2020.100912

Wargocki, P., Porras-Salazar, J. A., & Contreras-Espinoza, S. (2019). The relationship between classroom temperature and children’s performance in school. Building and Environment, 157, 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.04.046

Watson, D., Clark, L.A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-20

How to Cite

Ibanez, M. (2026). Influence of Classroom Ergonomics on Students’ Academic Productivity and Emotional Disposition. 12th International Scholars Conference 2025, 12(3), 628–638. https://doi.org/10.31154/isc12.v12i3.98.628-638