Students’ Perceptions of TOEFL Preparation Classes at Universitas Advent Indonesia

Authors

  • Nelson Balisar Panjaitan Universitas Advent Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31154/isc12.v12i3.86.587-599

Keywords:

TOEFL preparation, student perceptions, teaching methods, motivation, English proficiency

Abstract

This study explores students’ perceptions of TOEFL preparation classes at Universitas Advent Indonesia (UNAI), focusing on four key areas: teaching methods, skill improvement, learning challenges, and motivation. Given the importance of English proficiency for academic success, TOEFL classes serve as critical platforms for language development and standardized test readiness. The study adopted a quantitative descriptive design using a structured questionnaire distributed via Google Forms. A total of 125 students who had completed at least one semester of TOEFL preparation were selected through purposive sampling. Data were analyzed using SPSS to generate descriptive statistics.

The results, presented in Figures 1–4 and Tables 1–4, revealed that the majority of students perceived the teaching methods as effective (Figure 1), with over 80% agreeing that the instruction was clear, organized, and engaging. In terms of skill improvement (Figure 2), students reported gains in listening (mean = 4.21), grammar (mean = 4.12), reading (mean = 4.09), and vocabulary (mean = 4.25). However, students also reported facing challenges such as time pressure, anxiety, and unfamiliar vocabulary (Figure 3), with 63% indicating moderate to high difficulty. Motivation was a strong positive factor (Figure 4), with 78% of respondents agreeing that TOEFL preparation increased their enthusiasm and confidence in using English.

These findings highlight both the strengths and areas for improvement in TOEFL instruction at UNAI. The study contributes to the growing literature on English language learning in higher education and provides actionable insights for curriculum enhancement and student support services.

References

Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). Pearson Education.

Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed.). Heinle & Heinle.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.

Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. Edward Arnold.

Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05256.x

Khamkhien, A. (2010). Thai learners’ English pronunciation competence: Lesson learned from word stress assignment. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(6), 757–764. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.6.757-764

Lai, C. (2015). Modeling teachers’ influence on learners’ self-directed use of technology for language learning outside the classroom. Computers & Education, 82, 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.005

Phillips, D. (2001). Longman preparation course for the TOEFL test: The paper test (2nd ed.). Pearson Longman.

Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2002). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (3rd ed.). Pearson Education.

Tuan, L. T. (2011). EFL learners' motivation revisited. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(10), 1257–1272. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.10.1257-1272

Zhang, X., & Zhou, Y. (2011). The effectiveness of TOEFL preparation courses in China. Asian EFL Journal, 13(2), 98–122.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-20

How to Cite

Panjaitan, N. B. (2026). Students’ Perceptions of TOEFL Preparation Classes at Universitas Advent Indonesia. 12th International Scholars Conference 2025, 12(3), 587–599. https://doi.org/10.31154/isc12.v12i3.86.587-599