Breaking Barriers: Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Urban Evangelism and Mentoring —A Literature Review

Authors

  • Anne Lou Hendriks UNAI
  • Alvyn Cesarianto Hendriks Universitas Advent Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31154/isc12.v12i2.152.395-400

Keywords:

Urban evangelism, mentoring, challenges, interdisciplinary collaboration

Abstract

While the characteristics of the city, such as rapid urbanization, diversity, and social fragmentation, present challenges for urban evangelism and mentoring, there remains a challenge for every Christian to view the city as a place of harvest. As such, the following review explores how an interdisciplinary approach that incorporates theology, social science, education, and community development might improve urban evangelism and mentoring ventures. Cultural sensitivity, eclectic use of the disciplines for holistic ministry, and mentoring as a bridge between the disciplines are common threads. Interwoven within the review are recommendations for future research and practice.

References

Augsburg, T. (2006). Becoming interdisciplinary: An introduction to interdisciplinary studies (2nd ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing.

Banks, R., & Ledbetter, B. M. (2004). Reviewing leadership: A Christian evaluation of current approaches. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.

Bruun, H., Hukkinen, J., Huutoniemi, K., & Thompson Klein, J. (2005). Promoting interdisciplinary research: The case of the Academy of Finland. Helsinki, Finland: Academy of Finland.

Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Klein, J. T. (2017). Typologies of interdisciplinarity: The boundary work of definition. In R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein, & R. C. S. Pacheco (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (2nd ed., pp. 21–34). Oxford University Press.

McMillan, D. W. (2010). The role of the Christian university in interdisciplinary dialogue. Journal of Education & Christian Belief, 14(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/205699711001400206

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldanya, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A method sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Repko, A. F., & Szostak, R. (2021). Interdisciplinary research: Process and theory (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Stokols, D., Hall, K. L., Taylor, B. K., & Moser, R. P. (2008). The science of team science: Overview of the field and introduction to the supplement. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(2), S77–S89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.002

Tracy, S. J. (2020). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-20

How to Cite

Hendriks, A. L., & Hendriks, A. C. (2026). Breaking Barriers: Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Urban Evangelism and Mentoring —A Literature Review. 12th International Scholars Conference 2025, 12(2), 395–400. https://doi.org/10.31154/isc12.v12i2.152.395-400